Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Estimación de un índice de eficiencia para la Rama Judicial en Colombia: una aproximación mediante análisis de envoltura de datos
Keywords:
rama judicial, circuitos judiciales, eficiencia, programación, economía matemática, envoltura de datosAbstract
En este artículo se propone una medida para la Rama Judicial en Colombia para cuantificar su eficiencia. Se explica por qué es importante la eficiencia, el método escogido para estimarla y la robustez de los resultados encontrados. También se utilizan herramientas de programación de computadores que reflejan su importancia en la economía matemática moderna, además de facilitar y brindar mayores libertades en los cálculos de modelos complejos.
Los resultados muestran el comportamiento de los circuitos judiciales escogidos a través de los índices encontrados. Adicionalmente, queda abierta la posibilidad de realizar investigaciones futuras que complementen el análisis de envoltura de datos.
References
Andrews D. & Pregibon, D. (1978). Finding the Outliers that Matter. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 40(1), 85-93.
Azadeh, A., et al. (2011). An Integrated Data Envelopment Analysis-Artificial Neural Network-Rough Set Algorithm for assessment of personnel efficiency. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1364-1373.
Banker, R., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Bogetoft, P. & Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Stanford University.
Bogetoft, P. & Otto, L. (2015). Benchmark and Frontier Analysis Using DEA and SFA. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Disponible en: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/Benchmarking/index.html
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Seiford, L. & Stutz, J. (1982). A Multiplicative Model for Efficiency Analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 16(5), 223-224.
Coelli, T. (1996). A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) Working Paper No. 8.
Debreu, G. (1951). The Coefficient of Resource Utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 293-292.
Dimitrova-Grajzl, V., et al. (2012). Court Output, Judicial Staffing, and the Demand for Court Services: Evidence from Slovenian Courts of First Instance. International Review of Law and Economics, 32(1), 19-29.
Dimitrova-Grajzl, V., et al. (2016). Courts in a Transition Economy: Case Disposition and the Quantity-Quality Tradeoff in Bulgaria. Economic Systems, 40(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2015.09.002
Farrel, M. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-290.
Gholam, A. (2017). Impact of Outliers in Data Envelopment Analysis. Int. J. Industrial Mathematics, 9(4), 319-332.
Gillespie, R. (1976). The Production of Court Services: Analysis of Scale Effects and Other Factors. The Journal of Legal Studies, 5(2), 243-265.
Hernández, V. (2016). Análisis de la eficiencia relativa en el sistema judicial colombiano como funciones de producción, mediante análisis envolvente de datos (DEA) (Tesis de maestría). Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia.
Johnstone, I. & Titterington, D. (2009). Statistical Challenges of HighDimensional Data. Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 367(1906), 4237-4253.
Kneip, A., et al. (2010). A computationally efficient, consistent bootstrap for inference with non-parametric DEA estimators. Computational Economics, 38(4), 483-515.
Koopmans, T. (1951). An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities. En T. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph 13). New York: John- Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Murrel, P. (2001). Demand and Supply in Romanian Commercial Courts: Generating Information for Institutional Reform. IRIS Center _ Maryland University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.280428
Newman, P. (2016 [1987]). Convexity. En J. Eatwell & M. Milgrate The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
North, D. (1992). Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance. USA: ICS Press.
Paris, Q. (2011). Economic Foundations of Symmetric Programming. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Rapposelli, A. & Nissi, E. (2012). Analyzing Industrial Accidents in European Countries Using Data Envelopment Analysis. AIEL Series in Labour Economics, 6, 93-101.
Ricardo, R. (2016). La política de descongestión judicial 2009-2014, un costoso e ineficiente esfuerzo. Revista de Derecho Público, 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.15425/redepub.36.2016.06
Seiford, L. & Zhu, J. (1999). An Investigation of Returns to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 1-11.
Shepherd, R. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions. USA: Princeton University Press.
Simar, L. & Wilson, P. (2002). Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 115-132.
Simm, J. & Besstremyannaya, G. (2016).rDEA: Robust Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for R. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Disponible en: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/rDEA/index.html
Voigt, S. (2016). Determinants of Judicial Efficiency: A Survey. Eur J Law Econ, 42, 183-208.
Zhu, J. (2009). Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets (Segunda ed.). USA: Springer.
Published
Versions
- 2019-01-01 (2)
- 2019-01-01 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 Intercambio. Revista de Estudiantes de Economía
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.